Liability Questions
Who is at fault, how it is proven, and how disputed liability is handled.
Florida FAQs
Common questions about boating and maritime cases, answered in plain language by the Florida injury attorneys at The Marin Law Offices.
Boat injury cases follow a different procedural track than highway cases. Maritime jurisdiction can pull the case into the Southern District of Florida federal court, and the rules for evidence preservation, contributory negligence, and limitation of liability look different from a Miami-Dade Circuit case.
The most common patterns are wake-zone collisions in Biscayne Bay, jet-ski incidents off South Beach, and cruise-passenger injury cases out of PortMiami. Each has its own statute of limitations, often shorter than the two-year Florida personal injury default.
These FAQs explain when maritime jurisdiction attaches, how the cruise carriage contract changes the deadline, and what evidence must be preserved before the boat leaves the slip.
Concrete reasons to read before you call.
The answers below reflect Florida law on boating and maritime cases, not generic information that might apply differently in another state.
Florida statutes of limitations and notice requirements clearly identified.
PIP, BI, UM/UIM, MedPay, and umbrella coverage analysis for this case type.
What evidence matters most and how quickly it should be preserved.
Free consultations available in English and Spanish for follow-up questions.
A free consultation confirms how the framework applies to your specific facts.
Major question categories.
Who is at fault, how it is proven, and how disputed liability is handled.
Which insurance policies apply and how to identify available layers.
Statutes of limitations, notice requirements, and policy-specific timelines.
How treatment and medical documentation affect the case.
What categories of damages are recoverable and how they are valued.
How cases move from intake through resolution.
From first call to resolution.
We learn what happened, identify available coverage, and outline the boating and maritime cases case plan.
Scene photographs, witness statements, surveillance, and records preserved within days of intake.
Medical workup tracked through maximum medical improvement, then a documented demand presented to the insurer.
Litigation when negotiation will not produce a fair recovery. Trial preparation runs alongside settlement work.
★★★★★
5.0 from 50 Google reviews
★★★★★
“We had a wonderful experience with this law firm, especially with Mr. Donny Marin. Would definitely recommend.”
Jenny
★★★★★
“Donny has been a phenomenal person to work with during my legal representation. Very professional, supportive, honest, and will fight for your case.”
Adam
★★★★★
“What an amazing attorney. Always helpful, very attentive, very professional. I would recommend his firm to anyone needing a lawyer.”
Daniel
Representative Workflow
The Problem
Two passengers on a chartered boat are injured when the operator collides with another vessel near the Government Cut sandbar. The operator's BUI status was not assessed at the scene and the charter company invokes its limitation-of-liability contract.
Our Approach
The firm files a maritime suit in the Southern District of Florida federal court, demands preservation of the boat's GPS and engine-control data, and challenges the limitation-of-liability defense on operator-conduct grounds.
The Outcome
Federal discovery confirms the operator's conduct and the limitation defense is denied. The case proceeds against the charter company's marine liability policy with the operator's documented impairment in evidence.
Florida-specific
Framework knowledge
$0
Consultation cost
$0
Up-front client cost
English & Spanish
Languages
Free Consultation · English & Spanish
A free, no-pressure call clarifies your case-specific situation. No obligation.